Slide 25: Oregon ranks near the top of expenditures and own source revenue as a share of personal income

AI summary

TL;DR (generated · confidence: high)

Oregon ranks near the top of states in state and local expenditures and own-source revenue as a share of personal income. In 2022, Oregon's combined state-local expenditures (including federal transfers) represented 24.7% of personal income, while own-source revenue (excluding federal transfers) ranked 44th nationally at 30.4% of personal income.

Key points (each cites a PDF page):

State and local expenditures as share of personal income (2022, including federal transfers): Oregon at 24.7% (p. 425)
Own source revenue – State and Local combined: Oregon ranks 44th at 30.4% (p. 425)
Own source revenue – State only: Oregon ranks 47th (p. 425)
Own source revenue – Local only: Oregon ranks 31st at 19.5% (p. 425)
Apples-to-apples comparison is challenging; unique factors like Oregon's Kicker and inconsistent state/local reporting affect interpretation (p. 425)

Amounts: 24.7% · 30.4% · 19.5% · 44th · 47th · 31st · Dates/FTE: 2022 · Programs: Kicker · Parties: U.S. Census Bureau · Urban Institute · U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis

Slide 25: Oregon ranks near the top of expenditures and own source revenue as a share of personal income

Oregon ranks near the top of expenditures and own source revenue as a share of personal income State and Local Expenditures as a share of Personal Income (2022) Includes federal transfers 35% An alternative measure is own source revenue: th 30.4% State and Local combined – Oregon ranks 44 30% th State only – Oregon ranks 47 Local only – Oregon ranks 31st 24.7% 25% 19.5% 20% 14.1% 15% 10% 5% 0% Ohio Iowa Utah Idaho Texas Maine Florida Indiana Illinois Hawaii Alaska NevadaGeorgia VirginiaArizona Kansas Oregon Missouri Montana Alabama Vermont Colorado Arkansas MichiganMaryland Nebraska DelawareKentuckyWyoming New York California Oklahoma Minnesota Louisiana Tennessee Wisconsin Mississippi New Jersey Connecticut Washington New Mexico South Dakota United StatesPennsylvaniaNorth DakotaRhode Island West Virginia North Carolina Massachusetts South Carolina New Hampshire Note: A true apples-to-apples comparison of state expenditure is challenging, reporting at the state and local levels aren’t always consistent, and unique factors like the Kicker in Oregon make interpretation challenging Sou rce s: U. S. Census B ureau An nual Sur vey of State and Local Govern me nt Finances, 19 77-202 2 ( compi led by the Urban Institute), U. S. B ureau of Economic A nalysis

Parent: Section 1: Economic Competitiveness · PDF: p. 425